Clinical efficacy of selenium supplementation in patients with Hashimoto thyroiditis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests that selenium supplementation could be useful in the treatment of Hashimoto thyroiditis (HT), but the available trials are heterogeneous. This study investigates clinically relevant effects of selenium supplementation in patients with HT. METHODS: A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. The latest update was performed on December 3, 2022. We investigated the changes in thyroid peroxidase antibodies (TPOAb) and thyroglobulin antibodies (TgAb) after selenium supplementation. The effect sizes were expressed as weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: After screening and full-text assessment, 7 controlled trials comprising 342 patients were included in the systematic review. The results showed that there was no significant change in TPOAb levels (WMD = -124.28 [95% CI: -631.08 to 382.52], P = .631, I2 = 94.5%) after 3 months of treatment. But there was a significant decrease in TPOAb levels (WMD = -284.00 [95% CI: -553.41 to -14.60], P < .05, I2 = 93.9%) and TgAb levels (WMD = -159.86 [95% CI: -293.48 to -26.24], P < .05, I2 = 85.3%) after 6 months of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Selenium supplementation reduces serum TPOAb and TgAb levels after 6 months of treatment in patients with HT, but future studies are warranted to evaluate health-related quality or disease progression.

Monocyte to high-density lipoprotein ratio predict long-term clinical outcomes in patients with coronary heart disease: A meta-analysis of 9 studies.

BACKGROUND: A novel inflammation-related biomarker, the monocyte to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (MHR), had a great relation to the development and prognosis of coronary atherosclerotic heart disease. Current study was to investigate whether the MHR was a potential tool in predicting the mortality and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) in patients suffering coronary heart disease (CHD) by meta-analysis. METHODS: The Cochrane Library, PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, and Web of science were searched for relevant cohort studies published prior to February 10, 2022. The association between MHR and mortality/MACEs was analyzed in patients with CHD. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated to estimate the strength of association. RESULTS: In the meta-analysis, a total of 9 studies of 11,345 patients with CHD were included. Compared with the low level of MHR group, the high MHR value was associated with higher long-term MACEs (HR = 1.72 95% CI 1.36-2.18, P < .001), long-term mortality (HR = 1.71, 95% CI 1.10-2.66, P = .017), and in-hospital mortality/MACEs (HR = 2.82, 95% CI = 1.07-7.41, P = .036). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested that increased MHR value might be associated with higher long-term mortality and long-term MACEs in CHD patients. MHR might serve as a potential prognostic indicator for risk stratification in patients with CHD.

The effect of glucocorticoids on mortality in severe COVID-19 patients: Evidence from 13 studies involving 6612 cases.

BACKGROUND: Since the start of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there is an urgent need for effective therapies for patients with COVID-19. In this study, we aimed to assess the therapeutic efficacy of glucocorticoids in severe COVID-19. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed across PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library (up to June 26, 2021). The literature investigated the outcomes of interest were mortality and invasive mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: The search identified 13 studies with 6612 confirmed severe COVID-19 patients. Our meta-analysis found that using glucocorticoids could significantly decrease COVID-19 mortality (hazard ratio (HR) 0.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45-0.79, P < .001), relative to non-use of glucocorticoids. Meanwhile, using glucocorticoids also could significantly decrease the risk of progression to invasive mechanical ventilation for severe COVID-19 patients (HR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.58-0.83, P < .001). Compared with using dexamethasone (HR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.50-0.92, P = .012), methylprednisolone use had a better therapeutic effect for reducing the mortality of patients (HR = 0.35, 95% CI 0.19-0.64, P = .001). CONCLUSION: The result of this meta-analysis showed that using glucocorticoids could reduce mortality and risk of progression to invasive mechanical ventilation in severe COVID-19 patients.